Status: August 2026. This sample calculation is for orientation purposes only. Your specific investment will depend on the actual feed-in tariff, heating costs, surplus volume, and capital expenditure. As a current reference, new rooftop PV systems up to 10 kWp using partial feed-in receive a fixed feed-in tariff of 7.70 cents per kWh for systems commissioned on or after August 1, 2026. Your individual compensation may vary depending on the commissioning date, system output, and feed-in model. Source: Federal Network Agency (Bundesnetzagentur), status August 2026.
THE HONEST ANSWER
The short answer
An immersion heater can be worthwhile if there is a regular surplus solar power, a suitable storage system is already in place, and the current water heating method is comparatively expensive.
It is generally not worthwhile if there is only a small surplus, if high conversion costs are incurred, or if a very efficient water heating system is already in place. The deciding factor is not the household electricity price, but rather the comparison between the lost feed-in tariff, the actual heating costs avoided, and the total investment.
CHECK QUICKLY
These three values are decisive
-
01
How much surplus is usable?
It is not the total PV generation that counts, but only the electricity that remains after household consumption and can be used in the storage system at the same time.
-
02
What would be the alternative?
Compare the lost feed-in tariff with the heating costs that the immersion heater actually replaces – such as those for gas, oil, district heating, or electricity.
-
03
What is the cost of the entire solution?
The device, control system, installation, and any necessary adjustments to the storage system must be fully included in the invoice. Only the total price is suitable for the amortization calculation.
EXAMPLE: FOUR-PERSON HOUSEHOLD
A sample calculation with transparent assumptions
Important: The following values are intentionally marked as example assumptions and are not a forecast for your house. The 8 cents per kWh used is a rounded calculation figure; for your own calculation, you must use your actual feed-in tariff.
Assumed usable surplus solar power: 1,500 kWh per year
Assumed feed-in tariff: 8 cents per kWh
Assumed avoided heating costs: 20 cents per kWh
Assumed total investment: 600 euros
Annual economic benefit:
1,500 kWh × (€0.20 − €0.08) = €180 per year
Calculated payback period:
€600 ÷ €180 = approx. 3.3 years
The example shows: The more of your own surplus solar power that can be meaningfully used for water heating and the higher the costs of the replaced heat generation, the shorter the calculated payback period can be. Even small changes in heating costs, surplus solar power, or investment significantly alter the result. For fuels, you should use the costs of the actually replaced useful heat for an accurate calculation, not just the fuel price per kWh.
AMORTIZATION AS A RANGE
The same system, three possible results
-
SCENARIO A
Minor advantage
Avoided heating costs: 14 ct/kWh
Annual benefit: €90
Calculated payback period: 5.4 years
-
SCENARIO B
Moderate advantage
Avoided heating costs: 18 ct/kWh
Annual benefit: €150
Calculated payback period: 3.3 years
-
SCENARIO C
Higher benefit
Avoided heating costs: 22 ct/kWh
Annual benefit: €210
Calculated payback period: approx. 2.3 years
THE MOST IMPORTANT CLASSIFICATION
When does it make more sense to do so – and when does it not?
-
PROBABLY YES
More reasonable
Regular surplus solar power
Suitable storage system already available
Low installation effort
Relatively high previous heating costs
-
PROBABLY NOT
Probably not useful
Only a small usable surplus
High conversion or installation costs
Unsuitable storage
Already very inexpensive or efficient hot water heating
YOUR DECISION
Quick check before buying
-
01
Surplus available?
Regularly and in sufficient quantity?
-
02
Storage suitable?
Suitable installation opening, immersion depth and clearance?
-
03
Is the invoice correct?
Avoided heating costs higher than lost feed-in and investment?
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
Cost-effectiveness and payback period
How do you calculate the amortization of an immersion heater?
As a simple guide: total investment divided by the annual economic benefit. The annual benefit is calculated from the usable surplus quantity multiplied by the difference between avoided heating costs and lost feed-in tariff. Ongoing additional costs or subsequent maintenance should be taken into account if they are relevant. It is also important to only include the surplus solar power that can actually be used for domestic hot water heating at that time. The calculation is therefore always an object-specific approximation and not a fixed product feature.
Is an immersion heater worth it with a low feed-in tariff?
A low feed-in tariff lowers the opportunity cost of self-consumed solar power and can make self-consumption more economically attractive. Nevertheless, there must be a sufficient usable surplus, a suitable storage system, and an overall positive balance sheet. A low tariff alone does not make an immersion heater economical; the decisive factors are which heating costs are actually replaced and the total amount of the investment.
Is an immersion heater worth it for a PV system over 20 years old?
This can make sense. After the funding period ends, systems over 20 years old can continue to feed into the grid under current legislation; the feed-in remuneration is based on the annual solar market value minus a marketing fee. For 2025, the annual solar market value was 4.51 cents per kWh; the marketing fee for 2026 is 0.23 cents per kWh. The annual market value for 2026 will not be determined until after the end of the year. Whether additional self-consumption is economical therefore depends on your actual feed-in remuneration, the usable surplus, and the investment costs.
When is an immersion heater not worthwhile?
Probably not if there is little usable surplus, high installation or conversion costs, an unsuitable storage system, or if existing water heating is already very inexpensive and efficient. A long calculated payback period can also argue against the investment. In the case of district heating, heat pumps, or other low-cost heat sources, one should therefore calculate very carefully using their own tariffs and system values.
Which feed-in tariff should I use for my invoice?
Use the actual feed-in tariff for your own PV system. It depends on factors such as the commissioning date, the system capacity, and the type of feed-in. For new building PV systems up to 10 kWp with partial feed-in, the fixed feed-in tariff for systems commissioned from August 1, 2026, is currently 7.70 cents per kWh; older systems and systems over 20 years old may have significantly different values.
FURTHER GUIDES
More information about immersion heaters and surplus solar power
-
ADVICE
Retrofit immersion heater
To the guideRequirements, storage, connection, and planning explained in an understandable way.
-
ADVICE
Immersion heater or heat pump?
For comparisonA direct comparison of the two solutions in terms of efficiency, effort, and area of application.
-
ADVICE
Which electricity meter is compatible?
Regarding the electricity meter comparisonA comparison of Tibber Pulse IR, PowerOpti, and Shelly.
-
OVERVIEW
All guides
View all guidesDiscover more articles on immersion heaters, surplus solar power, and intelligent control.
-
LOCAL CONTROL
MQTT & Home Assistant
For local controlLocal control for tech-savvy users via MQTT; further smart home options and current requirements in the guide.
-
COMPATIBILITY
Check meter
Check compatibilityBefore selecting, check whether your electricity meter model is supported.